Category Archives: Uncategorized

‘Prensa mester ta un spiel cu ta refleha e comunidad’

I was interviewed by the journalist Luis Villegas of the local news paper Bon Dia Aruba on the occasion of Aruban press day where I elaborated broadly on the role of social media and news consumption in Aruba. The Interview was originally published here in Papiamento (local language): Aruban newspaper ‘Bon Dia 24’ on September 1st, 2017

Relaciona cu dia di prensa, Bon Dia Aruba a acerca Nadia Dresscher-Lambertus, kende ta un sociologo na Universidad di Aruba pa combersa riba temanan manera e rol di prensa tradicional den un sociedad contemporaneo y polarisacion di medio di comunicacion.

 Sra. Dresscher ta traha conhuntamente cu University of Amsterdam y ta specialisa den investigacionnan sociologico relaciona cu social media y media digital. Su trabou ta pa duna les na e universidad relaciona cu topiconan di sociologia, media y analisis di social networks. En particular sra. Dresscher ta haciendo investigacion pa su PhD relaciona cu politica riba Facebook na Aruba.

”Mi ta siguiendo politiconan riba social media desde cuminsamento di 2013 te cu fin di 2016. Dus mi tin un bista den e tempo cu politica riba Facebook tabata algo relativamente nobo te cu awo, unda cada politico y partido tin nan presencia riba social media.”

Sra. Dresscher ta splica cu e ta studia en particular e networks politico cu ta wordo forma riba social media, pero tambe cua ta e problemanan cu ta wordo treci dilanti den politica, e actornan cu ta trece esaki dilanti y e manera con nan ta trece e problemanan dilanti.

Rol di prensa tradicional den clima contemporaneo
Cu evolucion den tecnologia nos ta wak un cambio den diferente area, y seguramente den area di comunicacion y prensa. Medionan tradicional manera corant, radio y television ta haya nan mes den un situacion unda mester adapta na e clima of core riesgo di bira irelevante. Sinembargo, sra. Dresscher ta di opinion cu e medionan tradicional ta y lo keda importante. “Mi ta kere cu e contexto den cual e medionan tradicional ta opera a cambia”. Segun e sociologo, ta papia kinan di e concepto di hybrid media systems. Esaki el a splica cu ta ora medionan tradicional ta traha den medio digital tambe.

Sra. Dresscher ta duna un ehempel di un corant cu tin su grupo di persona como objetivo, pero cu por yega tambe na personanan cu no ta lesa corant via social media, y vice versa cu personanan cu no tin social media. Ademas, den e clima contemporaneo cu social media e noticia no ta bin cu e intencion preciso cu e autor a pone p’e. Sinembargo e ta expresa cu ‘nunca e noticia tabata wordo ricibi exactamente cu e intencion di e autor, tur hende ta percibi cosnan na diferente manera y nos tur ta formula nos opinion di e noticia’.

“E noticia ta bin cu ful un aura for di tur e hendenan cu a comenta riba dje. Dus bo por bisa cu bo ta lesa e noticia hunto cu otronan. E ta un experiencia hopi mas interactivo”.

E mesun dinamismo aki, sra. Dresscher ta splica, ta influencia e ciclo di noticia. “Den pasado por tabata e caso cu e prensa ta determina e agenda y prioridadnan di noticia, pero awendia nos ta wak cada biaha cu nos tin mas influencia riba esaki. Nos tambe ta construi media.”

Un manera cu por ilustra esaki di un manera humoristico, ta e varios remixnan cu a wordo crea di e segundo debate politico na Kamer van Koophandel. E importancia y percepcion di e debate aki a wordo forma tambe pa e diferente perspectiva humoristico riba esaki. Te hasta na e conferencia di prensa como respuesta riba e controversia di e debate, presidente di Camara di Comercio mes a toca su jingle crea pa un persona riba internet. Pa e reportero aki, e momento ey tabatatin un elemento di surrealismo, pero e por refleha di algun manera e estado di medionan di comunicacion awendia.

E efectonan cu clima contemporaneo di medionan por causa tin su parti negativo y positivo, sra. Dresscher a splica. Algo positivo cu por surgi di esaki ta e manera con grupo di hende ta organisa nan mes. Sra. Dresscher ta duna e ehempel di ‘e debate rond di amienda pa permiti parehanan di mesun sexo pa registra nan relacion y pa esaki wordo reconoci’. Esaki ta un movemento cu a wordo mobilisa y cu a busca sosten riba plataforma di social media. Alabes, sra. Dresscher ta remarca cu e contrincantenan di esaki a organisa nan mes tambe. “Esaki por claramente ilustra con diferente networknan ta mobilisa pa un causa”.

Filter bubble of echo chamber effect
Un efecto negativo cu e clima di medionan digital por tin ta un tipo di isolacion y un echo chamber effect, segun sra. Dresscher. “E filter bubble of efecto di echo chamber ta ora bo ta haya opinion y articulo riba internet of social media cu ta sirbi pa confirma bo mesun opinion. E ta impedi pa bo haya diferente perspectiva di un manera of otro.”

Aunke e fenomeno aki ta sirbi pa dramatisa e efecto di isolacion, sra. Dresscher ta splica cu esaki semper tabata e caso, te hasta prome cu social media. “Semper e personanan cercano na bo ta hunga un rol importante pa formacion di opinion y perspectiva riba e mundo rond di nos. Esaki ta un fenomeno humano, y nos ta yam’e homofilia.”
Awendia tecnologia ta hunga un rol hopi grandi den esaki. Sra. Dresscher ta splica cu: “e algorithm di servicionan manera Facebook ta dicidi p’abo cua noticia of informacion bo ta haya. Pa medio di studia ken bo amigonan ta, cua opinion tin entre boso, e algorithm por determina cua noticia bo ta haya.”

Un algorithm ta e manera con un computer ta programa pa colecta y procesa informacion. E algorithm por wordo programa pa rasona cu informacion y identifica esaki di cualkier manera. Sra. Dresscher ta splica cu den e caso di Facebook, cua ta e social media mas uza riba Aruba, ‘e algorithm ta pone un balor riba tur post. Ora bo wak un post tin ful un proceso den e background cu ta tuma luga’.

Segun sra. Dresscher, “e postnan ta wordo sortia a base di con nobo nan ta, cuanto reaccion tin riba dje, pero en particular si e hende cu a post esaki ta un persona cu bo conoce. Tur esaki Facebook ta calcula den e background. Asinaki Facebook ta dunabo noticia of post di un amigo cercano hopi mas lihe cu algo di un persona desconoci.”

Sra. Dresscher ta splica cu si bo no sa e procedura aki y con e ta traha, ‘bo por kere cu ora bo wak bo news feed e ta algo neutral. Pero esaki no ta berdad.’

Cu medionan tradicional manera corant, pa por ta un persona literato ta importante pa tene cuenta cu diferente pregunta. Entre otro, ken a skirbi e articulo, ki perspectiva nan ta duna, kico ta e meta di e articulo, ken ta esnan cu ta paga pa propaganda, e corant tin un ideologia, etc. Sra. Dresscher ta splica cu ‘esaki tur ta keda hopi relevante. Pero tambe mester tene cuenta cu loke nos ta yama e network effect’. Sra. Dresscher ta splica cu esaki kiermen cu mester analisa tambe unda bo a wak e noticia online prome.

Si un persona ta desea di sali di e filter bubble aki, sra. Dresscher ta recomenda pa trece mas diversidad den bo network. “Si ta trata di politica, like tur e politiconan y tur partido. Pero tambe si bo tin un amigo of amiga cu tin un opinion diferente na bo, purba wak kico e mes ta post. En general mester evita pa keda den un grupo cu ta laga bo isola cu un perspectiva.”

Advertisements

Notes on Ethnography as part of a mixed methods research process

This post is a short wrap-up on ponderings on combining ethnography in a more focused form as part of an assemblage of other methods

I’ve been reflecting the last couple of days on what makes ethnography distinctive in practical terms as a method. How does it differ from its other sister methods in their family of qualitative methods. For me the core of what makes ethnography different from other qualitative approaches is that you engage in firsthand research employing yourself (yes yourself!) as the primary research instrument. Your own and direct experiences with the object/phenomenon you are studying becomes the lens through which data is gathered and interpreted. That is why I find ethnography a bit intimidating, as you can imagine, this comes a with a lot of ethical responsibilities (okay all research methods do, but with ethnography you have to be more aware of how you write your subjects into texts).

When thinking about traditional ethnographic texts the first ones that come to mind are monographs in the style of Levi Strauss’ ‘Savage Mind’, or, to name a more contemporary example, ‘Gang Leader for a Day: A Rogue Sociologist takes to the Streets’ by Sudhir Venkatesh. And when thinking about these examples I can’t help by getting a bit intimidated by their ‘thickness’ (Glifford, 1973) in description and the self-assurance that splashes from their writing. The authors are truly ethnographic craftsmen; They sketch the setting with such descriptive intensity and skilled nuance by delving into the complexities of their object of study without fear. They do this in such a sincere way, justifying the interpretation of the data carrying the flow of experience that was caught by their agile senses which were constantly aiming at unobtrusively letting the subjects be, at keeping their voices intact. And all this in a methodological accountable manner: while describing how they as ethnographers systematically and carefully went about the detangling of complexity and how they have arrived at their interpretations.

As a sociologist (with a quantitative upbringing), I’ve been trained to always start with the research questions and let these be your guide when approaching empirical instances. But I have been lingering for the last couple of years too long in the realm of pure data, (data-driven) and have somehow let loose of questions, to purely marvel at what data -in my case social media data- is available. And from here let the data speak, (or scream, sing, cry to me) and listen…and see…and in this intimate interaction with the data, trust the process in which the questions and themes will emerge (organically) in a ‘grounded theory’ kind of way (Glaser and Strauss, 1967; Chamaz, 2014). In other words, I have been re-educated and now I can’t even think of a research design whereby I’m not combining the strengths both an quantitative as qualitative research. This is my attempt at shedding some light on how to approach ethnography in a context of combined methods.

Processed with VSCOcam with 7 preset

ponderings…


 

So what do I want out of ethnography?

Instead of wanting to address ethnography in its pure (time-consuming) form as a separate method standing on its own as Levi Strauss or Geertz Clifford did-, I just need ethnography as a starting point, as a way of making sense of the data available, for the familiarization with the setting and its particularities. As a researcher I develop a sensitivity for the uniqueness of my data. Resulting from this, is the arrival at a set of ‘sensitizing concepts’ (Blumer, 1954; Charmaz, 2014) that can further act as conceptual points of reference that can help me further combine the right methods with each other in order to continue the (mixed methods) research process.

Even if ethnography is just the starting point, it is an integral part, it has an important responsibility in the total research design and a core job to do: ‘getting real close to the data’ with a sense of openness that is also somehow slightly focused (let’s say: focussed in an open way). This focused part brings me to the first point I think is important, when conducting ethnography in such a way; To clearly state the objectives of why you have decided to conduct an ethnographic study (in such a way), and how this relates to your overall research design: what is its contribution, weight and priority (Creswell, 2003) of this part of the study in relation to the overall mixed methods design (Assuming here that we are talking about a mixed method design)

Articulating the objectives of the ethnographic part of your research process clearly
So even if ethnography is just a starting point, it can be an immensely important one, to a research process that will be also conducted through the different lenses of other methods. In other words, ethnography here is the prelude to your mix methods and contributes to your study of the phenomenon at least in the following important two ways:

in relation to other methods in a research design mix:

  • Its findings (preliminary but still ‘thick’ enough in format) will inform the rationales for the next steps you will take methodologically and help justify the further construction of a particular research design for the whole study. (In my case specific, a mixed methods approach). You consider the data that is available, the challenges and opportunities of this data, in order to strategize and choose from your methodology toolbox (e.g. by combining  ethnography with social network analysis, surveys and content analysis, just to name a few other possibilities methodological wise). The choice for starting with a brief ethnographic description is precisely because the objects/setting/actors (etc.) of study are complex, variable, and contested.

in relation to an emerging conceptual formation

  • In addition to that, conducting a brief ethnographic analysis of the phenomenon under study, helps awaken and further cultivate a theoretical sensitivity you need to further advance the study in a later more conceptually articulated way. With emphasis on sensitivity instead of a premature and harming theoretical contamination before the data had the chance to speak to you loud enough. Here ethnography is kind of your first ‘speed date’, but ‘thick’ and ‘slow’ enough to handle the data afterwards with much more strategic care and love. Or, in the language of Grounded Theory, ethnography as method  is conceptualized here as an ‘open coding’ kind of exercise.

In this sense, the ethnographic prelude as I’m conceptualizing it here matches what Knoblauch (2005) calls focused ethnography, these are:

(…) ethnographies that deliberately chose an approach which can be called focussed. As a peculiar form of ethnography, it is characterized by relatively short­ term field visits (i.e. settings that are “part­ time” rather than permanent). The short duration of field visits is typically compensated for by the intensive use of audiovisual technologies of data collection and data­ analysis. Length (extension) of data ­collection as it is common in conventional ethnographies is substituted for by the intensity of data ­collection. In addition, the lack of intensity of subjective experience in conventional ethnography is compensated for by the large amount of data and the intensity and scrutiny of data analysis. Writing is increasingly complemented by recording, solitary data collection by collective data collection and subsequent data analysis in collective data sessions. Instead of social groups or fields, studies focus on communicative activities, experiences by communication  (2005, p.3)

 

If you think of it, the benefits ethnography brings to the mixed method research design (Creswell, 2003) and mixed methods process are incredibly valuable and unique, it is your powerful ‘slow method’ or the ‘close reading’ swiss knife in your toolbox of methods. Because of this, you could also (in addition to conducting it at the beginning of the research phase or instead of starting with ethnography) close the research process circle with an ethnographic prologue and reflect on your findings with a real reflective ‘close reading’ (to borrow the term from literary criticism) of the data.

Bottom line is, be as precise as possible in articulating the added value -in terms of the focus- it brings to the research process.

 

I’m joining #AcWriMo

This year I’m joining Academic Writing Month, aka #AcWriMo.

November is the writing month!  Academics have their own version of National Novel Writing Month called ‘Academic Writing Month’, better known in the twittersphere as #AcWriMo. The idea was announced here by the academic writing website PhD2Published.

studying#AcWriMo revolves around the following principles:

Formulate a goal. Put time in your calendar (days of november) to work on it. The essence is having a concrete goal you commit to and work towards achieving. This concrete goal is in GTD terms a ‘project’ that you break down into smaller actionable (manageable) pieces (e.g. write 350 words a day, edit or revise a piece you have already written down, write for 2 hours a day, or say 4 pomodoros etc.). It’s important for you to state daily accomplishable goals.

Declare it to the world! There is an accountability factor to #AcWriMo. You are not alone, there is a whole public revolving around the twitter hashtag #AcWriMo. That’s how I came across the phenomenon; on twitter.  In a google doc spreadsheet  you can state your overall goal, plan (strategy) and actual achievement progress. What makes the experience special, is the feeling that you form part of a community. A writing community comes into being thanks to the hashtag/spreadsheet. You are part of a community of academics around the world all working towards a writing goal. On the meta level we are more aware also of the writing process on itself. This accountability factor works for me very well. At work I’m part of a small phd accountability group and you can’t imagine how awesome it is to discuss your progress with others; we support each other. Even if I don’t know the people using the hashtag, or the ones who have written down there names in the spreadsheet -personally-, you can read about their progress, you feel connected to them. This makes the writing process a more humane and social process.

Draft a strategy. Instead of ‘binging’ in order to accomplish a paper deadline and feel ‘fried’ afterwards (I have completed a couple of papers this way) you can spend some time thinking and reflecting in order to come up with a more sustainable writing strategy. It’s more than just planning. It’s also a mental preparation thing, envisioning yourself writing and preparing the physical and media-saturated environment for the cause (cleaning your desk of all distracting stuff or stop checking your Facebook newsfeed). It’s about setting time during the day, during the week, and in the month of November, in order to progressively accomplish your goal. PhD2Published emphasizes the importance of having a strategy as follow:

Don’t start AcWriMo without doing a bit of planning and preparation. Get some reading done, carve out time slots in your schedule to dedicate to writing, even buy your favorite coffee

Keep track of your progress (and talk about it with others!). You will see that writing is a labor of love, the more you invest in it, the better you will become at it. Academic writing on itself is a multifaceted process. it’s about developing writing habits and skills that can help you advance as a writer. This involves: planning, mind-mapping, drafting the structure of the paper, reading and taking notes, writing a specific part, feed-backing, concretizing your arguments, re-writing, (killing darlings) and did I say re-writing?! But also other ‘stuff’ like having more patience, dedication, discipline, a writing routine, structure, taking breaks and celebrating each step of the way. This article on 10 ways  you can write everyday taught me how to start perceiving academic writing in diverse ways than just putting words in a linear way on a blank paper/screen. Doing all this in a crowd is the added-value, it’s like being part of a cool party of writers.

Although November is a busy month for me full of other responsibilities, I will do my utmost in keeping my daily writing goals.

Tagged , , ,